Friday, July 20, 2007

The UFO Arena (minus the phenomenon itself)

community68.jpg

Science won’t intrude on the UFO community, and science won’t surely take a gander at the UFO phenomenon, not since the tainted Condon Committee, for the United States Air Force, seemed to eschew UFOs and flying saucers in its final report of 1968.

condon68.jpg

(Wikipedia has a thorough encapsulation of the Condon Committee’s efforts here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Condon_Report )

But science is wrong by avoiding a study of UFOs, since the phenomenon offers grist for several scientific disciplines, including psychology, sociology, mythology, and even quantum physics (as we detail elsewhere).

arena68.jpg

The problem for science is that they’d have to deal with the quacks, cranks, and UFO vagrants who’ve captured the phenomenon beginning in 1947, distorting its relevance by self-aggrandizement and totally inept (amateurish) investigations – and that includes astronomer J. Allen Hynek’s foray into the UFO world (first for the Air Force’s Project Blue Book and later for his own Center for UFO Studies).

hynek68.jpg

The UFO phenomenon is intriguing, and curious scientists – curiosity being the general demeanor of scientists – would normally be inclined to check out such a sporadic and circumstantial presence in the upper air.

The militaries of the world have taken notice, as have news media; the former seriously, the latter much less so.

But science, in this instance, just as it has with anything in the paranormal world, chooses to ignore or anathematize UFOs, and this because of the fanatic buffoons who’ve commandeered the phenomenon.

maven68.jpg

One can’t blame science, or scientists, from avoiding the UFO arena. What have they to gain by immersing themselves in a scrutiny of UFOs which will bring them opprobrium (as it has already for some) and ridicule?

The phenomenon doesn’t have the academic cachet that science feeds upon, and exploits for it own ends: career advancement, grant monies, recognition by peer groups, and university or corporate tenure. (The seeking of truth, nowadays, is at the bottom of many scientific goals.)

Yet, it’s the foolish ambiance that UFO arena purveys which has kept the phenomenon from a niche in the scientific pantheon.

If one looks at the investigation methods of “ufologists” (the mantle the hobbyists of the phenomenon has assumed) or the grammatical presentations of their hypotheses, one will be stunned by the lack of professionalism or even an understanding of logic and a decent methodology.

model68.jpg

The UFO community is diverse, but doesn’t include, at any level, spokespersons who give the impression that they are learned in any discipline that might lead them to a considered approach for unraveling the UFO mystery.

(One noted “ufologist” was heard to say, during a recent UFO documentary, that some UFO circumstances collaborated [sic] each other.)

There is a pretense in “ufology” that the phenomenon has been studied or investigated seriously and professionally but any perusal of the UFO material and UFO groups extant will show otherwise, and dramatically so.

logic68.jpg

Science would have to start from scratch to avoid the miscreant accretions that have accumulated around UFO episodes, many of which are, in their original form, scientifically interesting, to say the least.

Can science retake the phenomenon, and give it credibility? Perhaps. But science would have to work around the ufological vultures who won’t give up their hobby easily. UFO mavens are dogged about their avocation; fanatic, as we’ve said.

fanatic68.jpg

Is a workaround worthwhile? Maybe. Since UFOs are rife with attributes that may not pay off in material dividends, but could pay off in ways that are much more beneficial, to the human mythos and civilization, even if they (UFOs) end up being nothing more than a projection of mentally deficient persons, which is what the UFO arena consists of pretty much right now.

N.B. Log on to a web-site, UFO UpDates at http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/updates/latest/ for examples of the oppugnations mentioned above.

4 comments:

Brandon said...

You've got it backwards, in my opinion. The case is not that "science will not touch the ufo phenomenon because of the fanatic buffons in ufology." The case is rather that there exist fanatic buffons in ufology specifically *because* mainstream science will not touch it.

Think of any idea (possessing longevity) where there exist fanatics... ufology, new age, religion. These nutty "authorities" exist because ordinary people recognize that there is some reality there, but they cannot understand or interpret it. This is where science would normally enter, specialists to help people reach a common understanding or interpretation. But science will not touch these subjects because scientists at large have become blinded. They have become blinded by means of following an agenda, rather than simply inquiring into the nature of reality.

What logically follows from this situation? If no trained specialists will inquire into a legitimate aspect of reality, this certainly does not make that aspect go away. The people still desire answers, and so the door is wide open for any charlatan to step in and provide what the people are so desperately seeking. If there were trained specialists actively looking into it there would be no place for charlatans, they would naturally drop away.

I place the blame almost entirely on the scientific intelligensia. They stand at a slightly higher vantage point than the public at large, and so they have a responsibility to them. They are failing at this.

RRRGroup said...

Brandon:

Your points are well taken, and actually better than ours, perhaps.

The void created by scientific elitism does produce charlatanism.

Thanks for the astute observation.

Joseph Capp said...

Dear RRR group,
I like the subject of your article but you overlooked an important element about the fringe area in the UFO community. They might have been produced mostly by ET themselves. I don't mean created just inspired. George Adamski and others had very significant phenomenon reported around them in the beginning.
I have been going to the conferences the large and the small and speaking to some of the UFO "crazies" and many of them seem to have real experiences and have these wonderful feelings around UFOs. they know they are right as if inspired by a mystical experience.

If i was ET and wanted serious investigation off limits with scientist, having a weird public persona of people" associated with UFOs and the conferences to prove this subject is ridiculous not worth your time of day is a brilliant move. Being in control of the way something is viewed by your subject is very good disinformation. Doing it for at least 60 years is inspiring.

Joe Capp
UFO Media Matters

RRRGroup said...

Joseph:

Of course you're right, as usual; some strange things do seeem to accompany UFO episodes, things that seem to have nothing to do with the UFO sighting itself, but may very well be connected.

The Adamski affair is replete with weird accoutrements, but our concern in this post was how "ufologists" have responded to UFO sightings, and how science has been turned off by those responses.

Again, we send readers here to UFO UpDates where the panoply of inane and irrational is on display, in spades.